Maryland-Eastern Shore
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,559  Sharon Jerop SO 22:03
2,149  Neus Quinonero SO 22:43
3,114  Dypna Umunakwe SR 25:13
3,266  Amirah Jones SO 26:38
3,275  Jessica Roney FR 26:45
3,300  Luan Gabriel JR 27:13
3,317  Lenneisha Gilbert JR 27:47
3,383  Ayanna Lynn FR 31:17
National Rank #326 of 348
Mid-Atlantic Region Rank #35 of 38
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 30th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Sharon Jerop Neus Quinonero Dypna Umunakwe Amirah Jones Jessica Roney Luan Gabriel Lenneisha Gilbert Ayanna Lynn
DSU Hornet Invitational 09/09 1605 22:43 23:28 25:35 26:08 26:00 28:49 39:37
DSU Farm Run Invite 09/15 1553 22:02 22:49 24:53 25:37 26:27 28:02 32:33
UMES Cappy Anderson Invite 09/23 1649 22:00 22:41 25:37 27:30 27:23 27:18
DSU Pre-Conference Invite 10/07 1571 22:02 22:20 25:10 26:23 28:27 26:20 28:22
MEAC Championship 10/28 1574 22:04 22:36 25:35 26:51 26:27 26:28 25:50 30:34





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 30.9 1009 0.1 1.0 22.8 23.4 20.4



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Sharon Jerop 120.6
Neus Quinonero 165.8
Dypna Umunakwe 232.8
Amirah Jones 244.4
Jessica Roney 245.3
Luan Gabriel 248.3
Lenneisha Gilbert 249.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 0.1% 0.1 27
28 1.0% 1.0 28
29 22.8% 22.8 29
30 23.4% 23.4 30
31 20.4% 20.4 31
32 14.9% 14.9 32
33 10.8% 10.8 33
34 6.3% 6.3 34
35 0.6% 0.6 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0